Benchmarking the Treatment of CLOs

The proposed model-based designations for CLOs, and the broader move away from agency ratings, is resolving in some dimensions and increasingly uncertain in others. With the NAIC and regulators citing concerns over rating agency commercial interests biasing risk assessments and the appropriateness of using agency ratings in capturing tail risks, questions remain over what designations are intended to measure, and the degree to which the proposed intrinsic-price approach is an improvement. This report benchmarks the performance of NAIC intrinsic price designations against market-based measures, and explores the lessons learned from the treatment of structured assets across regulatory jurisdictions. We find that:

  • Intrinsic-price-based designations benchmark poorly to market spreads when compared to agency ratings. Despite data quality limitations, our analysis suggests the poor performance is, in part, inherent with the methodology whereby credit will generally receive higher quality designations as it approaches maturity. This maturity effect is a departure from the C1 framework, and can result in shorter dated, high-spread credit with low quality agency ratings (e.g., BB or B) assigned high quality intrinsic price designations (e.g., 1.a or 1.d)
  • Other regulatory frameworks often differentiate credit across agency rating categories and remaining maturity. Our estimates suggest remaining maturity may receive more punitive capital treatment under intrinsic-price-based NAIC designations than any other regulatory framework explored, including Solvency II and IAIS ICS

Critical to the discussion, we provide possible approaches that can more closely align the intrinsic price approach with the C1 RBC framework and identify characteristics that are associated with assets whose designations benchmark poorly, which can be used as a starting point for a more comprehensive study that can be used by the NAIC to improve upon their methodologies.

We hope you find this resource helpful –it is consistent with our goal of bringing value to our community.

Bridgeway Analytics
Bridgeway Analytics

Bridgeway Analytics was founded to redefine how insurance investors and their regulators navigate ever-increasingly complex capital markets.

Our solutions democratize the overwhelming set of investment regulations and metrics by codifying and distilling information to what matters most. We bridge practitioner needs for accelerated tactical and strategic decisioning with transparent and intelligent performance metrics. By aligning risk management, investment management, asset-liability management, financial reporting and compliance functions with regulatory requirements, our solutions improve efficiency and income generation.

At Bridgeway Analytics, we strive to create a resilient environment with an equitable culture, where everyone feels seen, heard, valued and empowered.

Luis Leguizamon
Chief of Market Strategy and Client Solutions
luis.leguizamon@bridgewayanalytics.com

Phone: 646.251.9752
bridgewayanalytics.com
1800 Gough Street, #2
San Francisco, CA 94109

View the contributor page

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news, events, and thought leadership by subscribing to our newsletter.

Note: Please make sure to check your spam folder if you don’t receive our confirmation email within a few minutes.

Related Articles

Related Articles

Register for Insurance AUM Journal

Register today to confirm your status as an institutional investor and gain access to the latest thought leadership in the industry.

  • Thought leadership delivered to your inbox
  • Confirm your status as an Institutional Investor
  • Complete CFA Continuous Professional Development requirements

By clicking submit you confirm that you qualify as an institutional investor and you consent to allow Insurance AUM to store and process the personal information submitted above.

Lost password