InsuranceAUM.com is the #1 Site for Insurance Investors. We are committed to our mission of education through the distribution of thought leadership and research.
For institutional investors only.
Contact us: journal@insuranceaum.com
InsuranceAUM.com is not a Registered Investment Advisor, Broker/Dealer, Financial Analyst, Financial Bank, Securities Broker, or Financial Planner. While InsuranceAUM.com seeks to present accurate and reliable information, InsuranceAUM.com does not endorse, approve, or certify such information, nor does it warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, efficacy, timeliness, or fitness of such information for any particular purpose. Information presented may or may not be current as of the date of the presentation, and InsuranceAUM.com has no duty to update and maintain the information, reports, or statements made during events.
The information presented is provided for information purposes only, and is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or any other advice, is general in nature, and is not specific to you. None of the information presented is intended as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or as a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any security, company, or fund.
Copyright © 2023 InsuranceAUM.com
Register today to confirm your status as an institutional investor and gain access to the latest thought leadership in the industry.
Don’t Let The Tail Wag The Dog: For Insurers, It’s Investment Discipline First, Capital Efficiency Second
This year was the year of the dog, according to the Chinese zodiac. For NEPC’s Insurance Investment Practice, 2018 was the year of rated-private-debt funds. As the search for yield has insurers looking to more complex and less liquid investments in private markets, we have fielded a significant number of requests from asset managers to review their capital-advantaged strategy. Referred to as “rated” or “capitaloptimized”, these funds are usually private (credit and infrastructure) debt vehicles structured to avoid the typical risk-based capital charges of similarly pooled private investments. As the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) considers changes to the accounting treatment of these vehicles, we would like to remind insurers that their due diligence process should stay the same. Only once the strategy is cleared and approved for investment, should the implementation vehicle be considered. A fund that is made up of non-investment-grade securities has that level of ultimate risk, regardless of the pooled rating.
HOW DOES THE FUND ACHIEVE CAPITAL RELIEF?
There are multiple mechanisms for an insurer to invest in a private markets strategy. The most common is a separately-managed account or a traditional limited partnership (or LLC) structure. While the two structures have advantages and disadvantages in terms of, for instance, size, accounting complexity and reporting, the capital charges are well defined.
Although there are a host of unique structures available, capital-optimized solutions usually fall into two broad categories:
RATED FUNDS
Currently, the rated fund only benefits life insurers, but the NAIC is also reviewing them for health and property and casualty insurers. The rated fund is similar to the traditional limited partnership structure, and is still a single-line item held on schedule BA. The fund has risk-based capital relief because it is rated by the Securities Valuations Office (SVO) or has an equivalent rating (the filing-exempt process) from a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO), often in the form of a private side letter.
NEPC’s understanding is that the equivalency mechanism will likely be made unavailable to insurers after January 1, 2019:
b. Condition to Eligibility – The “fixed income–like” regulatory treatment accorded under this Section 8 only applies to funds that the SVO has verified meet eligibility criteria established by the VOS/TF and been assigned NAIC Designations or reviewed under the verification procedures and added to an NAIC List or other NAIC compilation process as hereafter discussed in this Section 8. The use of NAIC CRP credit ratings under the filing exempt process discussed in Part Three, Section 1 (b) of this Manual shall not be an acceptable basis to apply for and receive the regulatory treatment specified in this Section 8. A private fund reported on Schedule BA, acquired prior to January 1, 2019 and reported with an NAIC Designation produced under filing exemption, can continue to be reported on the basis of a credit rating until sold or disposed of, provided the insurer also reports the investment on the Fund GI (General Interrogatory). Funds that do not qualify for the exceptions identified in this Section 8 would continue to be reported as common stock on Schedule D-2-2 or as other invested assets on Schedule BA without NAIC Designations. Note: In all cases where it is necessary for the reader to understand statutory accounting guidance or concepts, please refer to the NAIC Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual. Source: NAIC Memorandum, “Proposal to Add Comprehensive Instructions for Fund Investments to the P&P Manual”, January 31, 2018
DEBT-EQUITY
The debt-equity methodology creates a structure made up of fixed-income tranches, for instance, senior and junior, and an equity tranche. The differentiated fixed-income pools are rated and held on Schedule D, like any similar security, and the equity tranche is held on Schedule BA as a traditional alternative asset. The level of subordination, that is, the percentage of equity, can vary significantly.
SHOULD INSURERS INVEST IN RATED AND/OR CAPITAL OPTIMIZED STRATEGIES?
At NEPC, we prefer well-researched, credit-intensive private debt strategies over public assets that are rated below investment grade. While the insurance ratings overlay creates an additional level of risk that should be analyzed, it should not impact the investment process from a traditional due diligence perspective other than to potentially constrain the guidelines.
As with all private markets research, the insurer should evaluate the investment team, firm resources, opportunity set, investment thesis, track record, and back office capabilities. Once the strategy has passed all investment due diligence tests and has been approved for investment, then the implementation vehicle should be considered.
Under the current regulatory and ratings environment, it is understandable that insurers want to take advantage of the potential capital relief for private markets investment. It is important that insurers keep in mind that these are long-term investments and that the future regulatory environment may change. To this end, we suggest insurers consider the following questions:
By NEPC’s Insurance Investment Practice Group
Andrew Coupe, Senior Consultant
Matthew Rowell, Principal, Senior Consultant
ADDENDUM
The objective of this article was to focus on private markets and the regulation and accounting treatment for structures that exist in that universe. We deliberately avoided the discussion of how AM Best, another NRSRO, would incorporate these structures into its BCAR calculation (another key solvency model for US insurers). We are of the understanding that AM Best has constructed an investment working group that will assist with the evaluation of pooled investment vehicles. We strongly recommend that insurers discuss private markets allocations and the capital impact with their designated analyst.
DISCLAIMERS AND DISCLOSURES
• Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
• All investments carry some level of risk. Diversification and other asset allocation techniques do not ensure profit or protect against losses.
• The information in this report has been obtained from sources NEPC believes to be reliable. While NEPC has exercised reasonable professional care in preparing this report, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of all source information contained within.
• The opinions presented herein represent the good faith views of NEPC as of the date of this report and are subject to change at any time.
Related Articles
2023 Insurance Outlook with Wellington Management’s Tim Antonelli
INVESTMENT ADVISOR-OWNED INSURERS — A Proposal for Avoiding Pitfalls and Realizing Benefits
Mastering the Operational Challenges of Short Term Pools
RPM—Ep.24 | The 2023 Private Debt Market Outlook: Ariel Goldblatt and Mark Tsang
Related Articles
Podcast
Public Equity
2023 Insurance Outlook with Wellington Management’s Tim Antonelli
Private Credit
News & Events
Risk Management
Alternatives
Private Equity
Regulation and Accounting
INVESTMENT ADVISOR-OWNED INSURERS — A Proposal for Avoiding Pitfalls and Realizing Benefits
Regulation and Accounting
5 Things Every Insurer Should Expect From an Investment Accounting Provider
The Case for Senior Loans
The Conning Commentary: A Foundation Ready for Growth in 2023
Do Not Underestimate the Impact of Quantitative Tightening
Podcast
On the Mind: Thoughts On Topical Investment Issues Across the Industry