EM Debt Investing: Considering the Right Approach

display 1 - EM flows continue to be positive

Emerging-market (EM) debt’s strong returns and outlook have attracted flows from wide-ranging investors. Insurers calculating the expected returns of EM debt subsegments must adjust for the cost of capital, so that they can fairly assess opportunities versus other investments in their asset allocations.

Renewed Insurance Interest Bolsters Inflows
For investors looking for yield in an environment of low interest rates and compressed credit spreads, EM debt offers an attractive range of opportunities. Insurers have resumed their activity in this space, contributing to recent inflows. Insurance interest has picked up from a low point in 2013, when a spike in market volatility during the “taper tantrum” curtailed investment.

The flows into EM debt have spanned market segments. Hard- currency debt, local-currency debt, sovereigns and corporates have all benefited (Display 1). Hard-currency debt has led the way, with over $106 billion invested from 2016 to 2017. Local-currency debt has seen almost $50 billion in inflows during that period, as investors’ fears of another taper tantrum have decreased.

From a sector perspective, sovereign-bond and corporate-bond fund inflows totaled over $34.6 and $23.4 billion, respectively, while blended funds experienced even greater flows: over $54 billion. Even in 2018, which is off to a volatile start, trends in EM debt asset flows have remained positive.

Retail investors are generally agnostic about individual EM debt segments, focusing primarily on absolute returns. Institutional investors, in contrast, generally take a more granular approach. They tend to invest more selectively in specific subsectors of the market, as dictated by asset-allocation plans, risk appetite and—in the case of insurers—applicable regulations and capital charges.

Hard-Currency EM Debt: Charges are Similar to Developed Corporates
For insurers with liabilities denominated in the US dollar, investing in hard-currency debt (US dollar–denominated, for simplicity’s sake) is a natural extension of their corporate-bond allocation, so hard-currency debt may be a significant part of their allocation.

The required capital-charge rate for an EM hard-currency bond (either sovereign or corporate) is similar to the capital charge for a developed- market corporate bond with the same rating. This holds true under the supervision of many regulatory bodies, including the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) for insurers in the US, and Solvency II for European insurers.

Under the NAIC Risk-Based Capital (RBC) framework, non-US sovereigns and corporates are effectively treated the same as US corporates (Display 2). There is no explicit country or region input into the formula. As is the case with US credit, the NAIC’s designation is directly derived from ratings assigned by a NRSRO for a particular issue. The rules are very similar under Solvency II.

For insurers that hold liabilities in another currency—such as the euro, pound sterling or yen—investing in hard-currency EM debt is also a natural extension of their credit allocation. However, these insurers now have to account for the currency-hedging cost, too, just as they would when investing in US corporate bonds.

When currency-hedging costs are elevated, as is the case today for European and Japanese investors, the extra yield spread that EM investment-grade debt typically offers versus US corporate bonds (Display 3 may help overcome that added cost.

Local-Currency EM Debt: Cost Considerations
Insurance companies shouldn’t overlook the potential of EM local-currency debt. This segment does bring currency risk, which may result in an additional capital charge under certain regulatory regimes. However, it can offer attractive return potential in the right environment.

Under Solvency II, the capital-charge rate for currency risk is 25%; for NAIC- regulated insurers, there is no explicit capital charge. Under NAIC RBC, a US dollar-denominated BBB-rated bond has the same capital charge as a bond of the same rating issued in South African rand— even though the underlying economic, credit and interest-rate environments may be quite different.

For US-domiciled insurers, local-currency EM debt investments can bring greater internal complexities—and potentially more volatile financial results. Also, under both NAIC RBC and Solvency II, systematically hedging the currency risk of EM local-currency bonds is very likely to be expensive, with the future cost of hedging more unpredictable than for hard- currency hedging. As a result, insurers investing in local EM debt may prefer to simply bear the currency risk.

The implication for insurance investors: the expected returns from local-currency EM debt must compensate for the added cost of capital and the complications from currency risk. Positioning in this market segment becomes less about substituting for corporate bond exposure and more about having an allocation to a total-return strategy, especially compared with riskier and more capital-intensive asset classes like equities or hedge funds.

High-Yield: Potential, But Adjust for Cost of Capital
In the hard-currency EM debt segment, as mentioned earlier, the discussion of capital charges is similar to the one happening with developed-market corporate bonds.

In accordance with local regulations, high-yield bonds are either significantly more expensive than investment-grade bonds from a capital point of view, or they’re simply inadmissible. In the US and Europe, where high-yield bonds are admissible, it’s important to adjust yields for the cost of capital when comparing the relative value of investment-grade and high-yield EM debt.

Where it’s appropriate, insurers should consider adding higher-rated high- yield bonds because of the potential for price gains if the issuer’s fundamentals improve. For example, a BB-rated issuer with strengthening fundamentals could be on the verge of an upgrade to investment-grade bonds. The bond could see substantial price appreciation before the official rating upgrade takes place. A portfolio that ignores higher-rated high-yield issuers will miss out on these opportunities.

Understanding Potential Credit Risks Is Key
However, insurance companies should also be aware of the risk of mark-to-market volatility, as well as credit impairment (or default) risk. Even in these cases, though, having a keen understanding of such risks can still allow insurers to invest prudently in the EM debt space.

One example of these risks was the impact of declining crude-oil prices in 2015 and 2016. This development put tremendous pressure on oil and gas companies, many of which were domiciled in EM countries. Even some investment-grade issuers defaulted. It required deep active research to evaluate thevmacro environment, understand businesses from the bottom up and determine which were at risk and which were being unfairly punished. The judicious use of stress testing provided insight into which companies were best equipped to survive.

Another instance was Brazil’s sovereign- debt downgrade to below investment grade—the result of a corruption scandal in 2015. Brazilian corporate bonds also suffered, and only careful monitoring of sovereign developments and an in-depth knowledge of individual issuers provided insight into which issuers could weather the storm. In general, exporters were the better bet, because their businesses were less closely tied to the Brazilian economy.

The Big Picture
Overall, EM debt has posted impressive performance over the past few years, attracting substantial inflows. Given the continued strong fundamentals across many countries, there are wide-ranging opportunities in this market for discerning investors.

Insurance companies should also consider that capital-charge rates for many EM debt sectors aren’t far removed from the charges for US bonds with the same credit rating. In addition, the more capital- intensive sectors may be worth a closer look, especially relative to other investments in their overall asset allocation.

By AllianceBernstein
Originally published in Insider Insights.

Note to All Readers: The information contained here reflects the views of AllianceBernstein L.P. or its affiliates and sources it believes are reliable as of the date of this publication. AllianceBernstein L.P. makes no representations or warranties concerning the accuracy of any data. There is no guarantee that any projection, forecast or opinion in this material will be realized. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views expressed here may change at any time after the date of this publication. This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. AllianceBernstein L.P. does not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. It does not take an investor’s personal investment objectives or financial situation into account; investors should discuss their individual circumstances with appropriate professionals before making any decisions. This information should not be construed as sales or marketing material or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, product or service sponsored by AllianceBernstein L.P. or its affiliates. Note to Canadian Readers: This publication has been provided by AllianceBernstein Canada, Inc. or Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC and is for general information purposes only. It should not be construed as advice as to the investing in or the buying or selling of securities, or as an activity in furtherance of a trade in securities. Neither AllianceBernstein Institutional Investments nor AllianceBernstein L.P. provides investment advice or deals in securities in Canada. Note to European Readers: This information is issued by AllianceBernstein Limited, a company registered in England under company number 2551144. AllianceBernstein Limited is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA–Reference Number 147956). Note to Austrian and German Readers: This information is issued in Germany and Austria by AB Europe GmbH. Note to Swiss Readers: This document is issued by AllianceBernstein Schweiz AG, Zürich, a company registered in Switzerland under company number CHE-306.220.501. AllianceBernstein Schweiz AG is authorised and regulated in Switzerland by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) as a distributor of collective investment schemes. Swiss Representative & Swiss Paying Agent: BNP Paribas Securities Services, Paris, succursale de Zürich. Registered office: Selnaustrasse 16, 8002 Zürich, Switzerland, which is also the place of performance and the place of jurisdiction for any litigation in relation to the distribution of shares in Switzerland. The Prospectus, the key investor information documents, the Articles or management regulations, and the annual and semiannual reports of the concerned fund may be requested without cost at the offices of the Swiss representative. Note to Readers in Japan: This document has been provided by AllianceBernstein Japan Ltd. AllianceBernstein Japan Ltd. is a registered investment-management company (registration number: Kanto Local Financial Bureau no. 303). It is also a member of the Japan Investment Advisers Association; the Investment Trusts Association, Japan; the Japan Securities Dealers Association; and the Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association. The product/service may not be offered or sold in Japan; this document is not made to solicit investment. Note to Australian Readers: This document has been issued by AllianceBernstein Australia Limited (ABN 53 095 022 718 and AFSL 230698). The information in this document is intended only for persons who qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth of Australia), and should not be construed as advice. Note to Hong Kong Readers: This document is issued in Hong Kong by AllianceBernstein Hong Kong Limited (聯博香港有限公司), a licensed entity regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. This document has not been reviewed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. Note to Readers in Vietnam, the Philippines, Brunei, Thailand, Indonesia, China, Taiwan and India: This document is provided solely for the informational purposes and is not investment advice, nor is it intended to be an offer or solicitation, and does not pertain to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any person to whom it is sent. This document is not an advertisement. AB is not licensed to, and does not purport to, conduct any business or offer any services in any of the above countries. Note to Readers in Malaysia: Nothing in this document should be construed as an invitation or offer to subscribe to or purchase any securities, nor is it an offering of fund-management services, advice, analysis or a report concerning securities. AB is not licensed to, and does not purport to, conduct any business or offer any services in Malaysia. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, AB does not hold a capital-markets services license under the Capital Markets & Services Act 2007 of Malaysia, and does not, nor does it purport to, deal in securities, trade in futures contracts, manage funds, offer corporate finance or investment advice, or provide financial-planning services in Malaysia. Note to Singapore Readers: This document has been issued by AllianceBernstein (Singapore) Ltd. (“ABSL”, Company Registration No. 199703364C). ABSL is a holder of a Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore to conduct regulated activity in fund management and dealing in securities. AllianceBernstein (Luxembourg) S.à r.l. is the management company of the portfolio and has appointed ABSL as its agent for service of process and as its Singapore representative. This document has not been reviewed by the MAS. Market Risk: The market values of the portfolio’s holdings rise and fall from day to day, so investments may lose value. Interest-Rate Risk: Fixed- income securities may lose value if interest rates rise or fall—long-term securities tend to rise and fall more than short-term securities. The values of mortgage-related and asset-backed securities are particularly sensitive to changes in interest rates due to prepayment risk. Credit Risk: A bond’s credit rating reflects the issuer’s ability to make timely payments of interest or principal—the lower the rating, the higher the risk of default. If the issuer’s financial strength deteriorates, the issuer’s rating may be lowered and the bond’s value may decline. Inflation Risk: Prices for goods and services tend to rise over time, which may erode the purchasing power of investments. Foreign (Non-US) Risk: Investing in non-US securities may be more volatile because of political, regulatory, market and economic uncertainties associated with such securities. These risks are magnified in securities of emerging or developing markets. Currency Risk: If a non-US security’s trading currency weakens versus the US dollar, its value may be negatively affected when translated back into US-dollar terms. Diversification Risk: Portfolios that hold a smaller number of securities may be more volatile than more diversified portfolios, since gains or losses from each security will have a greater impact on the portfolio’s overall value. Derivatives Risk: Investing in derivative instruments such as options, futures, forwards or swaps can be riskier than traditional investments, and may be more volatile, especially in a down market. Leverage Risk: Trying to enhance investment returns by borrowing money or using other leverage tools may magnify both gains and losses, resulting in greater volatility. Below-Investment-Grade Risk: Investments in fixed-income securities with lower ratings (commonly known as “junk bonds”) tend to have a higher probability that an issuer will default or fail to meet its payment obligations. Liquidity Risk: The difficulty of purchasing or selling a security at an advantageous time or price. The information contained here reflects the views of AllianceBernstein L.P. or its affiliates and sources it believes are reliable as of the date of this publication. AllianceBernstein L.P. makes no representations or warranties concerning the accuracy of any data. There is no guarantee that any projection, forecast or opinion in this material will be realized. AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (ABI) is the distributor of the AllianceBernstein family of mutual funds. ABI is a member of FINRA and is an affiliate of AllianceBernstein L.P., the manager of the funds. The [A/B] logo is a registered service mark of AllianceBernstein and AllianceBernstein® is a registered service mark used by permission of the owner, AllianceBernstein L.P.
© 2018 AllianceBernstein L.P. 18-xxxx
Alliance Bernstein
Alliance Bernstein

AllianceBernstein manages $691 billion* in assets globally for a diverse group of clients—from individual investors to the world’s largest institutions. For more than four decades, we’ve partnered with sophisticated insurance clients, offering diverse investment expertise and a focus on insurers’ needs. Today, we manage $170 billion in insurance assets across fixed income, alternatives and equities. With our dedicated team of insurance investment experts, regional insurance strategists and relationship advisors, AB provides 360-degree coverage…and the focus needed to deliver what matters most to insurers.
*As of June 30, 2023

Craig Schorr
Head of NA Insurance
+1 212-823-2712

1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105

View the contributor page

Related Articles

Register for Insurance AUM Journal

Register today to confirm your status as an institutional investor and gain access to the latest thought leadership in the industry.

  • Thought leadership delivered to your inbox
  • Confirm your status as an Institutional Investor
  • Complete CFA Continuous Professional Development requirements

By clicking submit you confirm that you qualify as an institutional investor and you consent to allow Insurance AUM to store and process the personal information submitted above.

Lost password